Assignment Details
Based on the case study selected in Unit 1, develop a context diagram and a decision tree, and decide on using either an off-the-shelf software or developing custom software.
Evaluate the project requirements for the project selected (i.e., mission statement, SWOT analysis, identify key system stakeholders). Be sure to annotate changes made. Then, address the following:
Create a context diagram. Identify the process and entities, and provide at least 1 inflow and 1 outflow into each entity.
Create a decision tree.
Evaluate the pros and cons for using customized software and off-the-shelf software.
Briefly evaluate the project system approach.
MS Word Document Format
Create a 4-page Word document following APA guidelines. Approach this document as a technical document, written for a technical audience.
Specific requirements include the following:
Title page (does not count toward the 4-page requirement)
Executive summary
Context diagram and description
Decision tree and description
Software pros and cons
Unit assignment summary (reflect on assignment lessons learned)
Sources of information (References page, does not count toward the 4-page requirement).
Save your document with the course, assignment, and your name (e.g., ITCO-502_Unit2_IP_Neo_Anderson.docx). Submit your document for grading.
Assignment Reminders:
Please submit your assignment: Assignment Submission.
Make sure you submit this assignment by the listed due date. Late deductions will apply for this assignment. Please refer to the policy: Late Submissions of Assignments.
If you need assistance, please view the Troubleshooting tips:
Resave in the proper format per the Assignment Detail instructions and resubmit.
Submit with a different Web browser.
Submit from a different computer.
Call Technical Support at 877-221-5800, Menu Option 2. They are open 24/7.
If you are still having difficulties after trying steps 1–4, please contact your course instructor.
Assignment Rubric
Criterion 1: Follows Instructions
Points Possible:
14
14 points
Assignment addresses all the required topics and questions within the instructions.
Meets or exceeds minimum length and does not significantly exceed the maximum length requirement.
11.2 points
Assignment addresses most of the required topics and questions within the instructions.
Meets or exceeds minimum length and does not significantly exceed the maximum length requirement.
8.4 points
Assignment includes more than half of the required topics and questions within the instructions.
Assignment is slightly less than the minimum length requirement OR significantly exceeds the maximum length requirement.
5.6 points
Assignment includes half of the required topics and questions within the instructions.
Assignment is moderately less than the minimum length requirement OR significantly exceeds the maximum length requirement.
2.8 points
Assignment includes less than half of the required topics and questions within the instructions.
Assignment is significantly less than the minimum length requirement OR more than double the maximum length requirement.
0 points
No assignment submitted.
OR
Assignment did not meet the Beginning requirements.
Criterion 2: Content and Visuals
Points Possible:
63
63 points
All of the Content & Visuals Criteria are evident in the submitted assignment:
Visual displays are appropriate and illustrate key topics.
Assignment topics are explained in full and accurate detail.
Content is developed, appropriate, and relevant.
Terminology is accurate.
Demonstrates an understanding of the content.
Explanations demonstrate accurate understanding of assignment topics.
50.4 points
At least four of the Content & Visuals Criteria are evident in the submitted assignment.
37.8 points
Three of the Content & Visuals Criteria are evident in the submitted assignment.
25.2 points
Two of the Content & Visuals Criteria are evident in the submitted assignment.
12.6 points
One of the Content & Visuals Criteria is evident in the submitted assignment.
0 points
No assignment submitted.
OR
Assignment did not meet the Beginning requirements.
Criterion 3: Critical Thinking
Points Possible:
21
21 points
Assignment demonstrates all of the Critical Thinking Criteria:
Evaluation of key concepts
Demonstrate justified positions with evidence (selecting and using information to investigate a point of view or conclusion)
Influence of context and assumptions
Original thought; student’s position (perspective, thesis/hypothesis)
Conclusions and related outcomes (implications and consequences)
Concluding remarks show analysis and synthesis of ideas
16.8 points
At least four of the Critical Thinking Criteria are evident in the submitted assignment.
12.6 points
Three of the Critical Thinking Criteria are evident in the submitted assignment.
8.4 points
Two of the Critical Thinking Criteria are evident in the submitted assignment.
4.2 points
One of the Critical Thinking Criteria is evident in the submitted assignment.
0 points
No assignment submitted.
OR
Assignment did not meet the Beginning requirements.
Criterion 4: Writing
Points Possible:
21
21 points
Assignment has no spelling or grammar errors.
16.8 points
Assignment contains few minor spelling or grammar errors that do not significantly impact readability of the assignment.
12.6 points
Assignment contains several minor spelling or grammar errors that do not significantly impact readability of the assignment.
8.4 points
Assignment contains noticeable spelling or grammar errors that may impact readability of the assignment.
4.2 points
Assignment contains numerous spelling or grammar errors that significantly impact readability of the assignment.
0 points
No assignment submitted.
OR
Assignment did not meet the Beginning requirements.
Criterion 5: Scholarly Support, Document Organization, & APA Formatting
Points Possible:
21
21 points
All of the Scholarly, Organization, & Formatting Criteria are evident in the submitted assignment:
Supporting references are content-appropriate and credible or scholarly.
Paper flows from one topic to the next with no disjointedness.
Content is organized through paragraph structure and sentence flow to enhance readability.
All resources are cited and referenced in APA format.
Document is formatted properly according to the current APA Publication Manual.
